User talk:C56C

Hovind and accredidation (sp?)

It seemed unnecessary to me to include "non-accredited" on the "one-year" institution. I think that's why it wasn't reinserted when the other two were. I don't object, though. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the one year degree is unusual, some techincal schools that are accredited can give out cerfticates for one years worth of work. It is unaccredited and should be mentioned as such. Maybe I missed the explanation, but do feel it belongs. C56C 16:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Vitter RFC

Could you please leave your comments at a Davit Vitter RFC? Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk 15:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

America 21

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article America 21, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of America 21. Shell ^babelfish 17:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Conservative organizations in the United States

I have nominated Category:Conservative organizations in the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Griffith (US politician)

The article William Griffith (US politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence Mr. Griffith meets the general notability guideline or the notability guideline for politicians.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Hysteria18 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 21:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Creation Safaris" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Creation Safaris. Since you had some involvement with the Creation Safaris redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, C56C! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Firestar464 (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]